Jagiellonian University
Tomasz Smoleń

Field: Cognitive psychology, Cognitive science, Statistics

Interests: Decision strategies, Evolutionary psychology, Machine learning, Bayesian statistics

Affiliation: Jagiellonian University, Institute of Philosophy, Deprtment of Cognitive Science

Position: Assistant professor

Clases 2018/2019


Czernecka, K., Fryt, J., Szczygieł, M., Torre, A., & Smolen, T. (2018). Many face(t)s of young people’s risk-taking: Individual and situational determinants. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 6(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2018.72268 [link] [BibTeX]

Smolen, T., Jastrzębski, J., Estrada, E., & Chuderski, A. (2018). Most evidence for the compensation account of cognitive training is unreliable. Memory and Cognition, 46(8), 1315–1330. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0839-z [link] [BibTeX]

Fryt, J., Smolen, T., Czernecka, K., Torre, A. La, & Szczygieł, M. (2017). Risk, Cognitive Control, and Adolescence: Challenging the Dual Systems Model. In G. Gunzelman, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, & E. J. Davelaar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2037–2042). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. [link] [BibTeX]

Gacek, M., Smolen, T., & Pilecka, W. (2017). Consequences of Learned Helplessness and Recognition of the State of Cognitive Exhaustion in Persons with Mild Intellectual Disability. AdvAnces in Cognitive Psychology, 13(1), 42-51. http://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0205-6 [link] [BibTeX]

Smolen, T., & Chuderski, A. (2017). Semantic Conflict Mobilizes Self-Control in a Realistic Task. Current Psychology. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9594-8 [link] [BibTeX]

Chuderski, A., & Smolen, T. (2016). An integrated utility-based model of conflict evaluation and resolution in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 123(3), 255–290. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0039979 [link] [BibTeX]

Wichary, S., & Smolen, T. (2016). Neural Underpinnings of Decision Strategy Selection: A Review and a Theoretical Model. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10, 1–13. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00500 [link] [BibTeX]

Andrelczyk, K., Chuderski, A., & Smolen, T. (2015). When and Why Does Visual Working Memory Capacity Depend on the Number of Visual Features Stored: An Explanation in Terms of an Oscillatory Model. In N. A. Taatgen, M. K. van Vugt, J. P. Borst, & K. Mehlhorm (Eds.), Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 166-171). Groningen: University of Groningen. [link] [BibTeX]

Smolen, T., & Chuderski, A. (2015). The Effect of Evoked Conflict on Executive Control in a Realistic Task. In G. Airenti, B. G. Bara, & G. Sandini (Eds.), Proceedings of the EuroAsianPacific Joint Conference on Cognitive Science (pp. 441–446). Torino: University of Torino. [link] [BibTeX]

Smolen, T., & Chuderski, A. (2015). The quadratic relationship between difficulty of intelligence test items and their correlations with working memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:1270. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01270 [link] [BibTeX]

Chuderski, A., Smolen, T., & Taraday, M. (2014). Neither a Response Nor Stimulus Set-Size Effect Found in the Manual Stroop Task. Studia Psychologica, 56(1), 21–35. [link] [BibTeX]

Chuderski A., Andrelczyk, K., & Smolen, T. (2013). An oscillatory model of individual differences in working memory capacity and relational integration. Cognitive Systems Research, 24, 87–95. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2012.12.005 [link] [BibTeX]

Fryt, J., Pilecka, W., & Smolen, T. (2013). Does Asthma Disturb Executive Functions and Self-regulation in Children? Polish Journal of Applied Psychology, 12(2), 169–185. [link] [BibTeX]

Fryt, J., Pilecka, W., & Smolen, T. (2013). Importance of symptom control: self-regulation in children with diabetes type 1 and asthma. Studia Psychologiczne, 51(3), 5–18. http://doi.org/10.2478/v10167-010-0069-2 [link] [BibTeX]

Andrelczyk, K., Smolen, T., & Chuderski, A. (2012). Oscillatory Basis of Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity. In N. Rußwinkel, U. Drewitz, & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 181-186). Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin. [link] [BibTeX]

Chuderski, A., Taraday, M., Nęcka, E., & Smolen, T. (2012). Storage capacity explains fluid intelligence but executive control does not. Intelligence, 40(3), 278–295. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.02.010 [link] [BibTeX]

Smolen, T. (2012). Bayesowska teoria oceny podobieństwa i kategoryzacji. In J. Bremer & A. Chuderski (Eds.), Pojęcia (pp. 247–269). Kraków: TAiWPN Universitas. [link] [BibTeX]

Smolen, T. (2012). Is Decision Making Rational and General? The Optimising Model of Decision Making. Frontiers in Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1(3), 37–48. [link] [BibTeX]

Smolen, T., Andrelczyk, K., & Chuderski, A. (2012). Neurocognitive mechanisms of reasoning ability: An oscillatory model of individual differences in relational integration. In N. Gierasimczuk, P. Łupkowski, & M. Urbański (Eds.), Logic and Cognition(pp. 49–59). Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University. [link] [BibTeX]

Chuderski, A., & Smolen, T. (2011). The Effect of Response Set Size on the Stroop Interference. In L. Carlson, C. Höscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society(pp. 2162–2167). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. [link] [BibTeX]

Smolen, T., & Chuderski, A. (2010). Modeling strategies in Stroop with a general architecture of executive control. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of Cognitive Science Society (pp. 931–936). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. [link] [BibTeX]

Smolen, T., & Wichary, S. (2008). Bottom-Up Model of Strategy Selection. In C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society(pp. 1517–1521). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. [link] [BibTeX]

Selected Presentations & Posters



((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))